Why is this Case not in the Public Media. So many Questions remain unanswered here. Kilcline is being at present Investigated on other matters by the Serious Fraud Unit at Harcourt Square. One must also state Innocent until proven Guilty by a Court?

Posted by

VOCAL. “Victims of Child Abuse Laws of Ireland”

@eddieyucasebook Personal Blog
I made a complaint to the Law Society five years ago concerning the solicitor Fiona Murray and I have been given the runaround by the Law Society in the shape of a Martin Clohessy. Enough is enough. The letter below was sent by registered post to Clohessy
today the 9th of March 2016 and I now intend to publish in the public domain the full correspondence concerning my complaint.
Mr Martin Clohessy
Complaints Executive
Regulation Department
The Law Society
George’s Court
George’s Lane
Dublin 7.
09 March 2016
Your Reference: S7242/199/M/17/20 Re: Fiona M Murray, solicitor.
Dear Sir,
Further to my letter to you of the 29th of February 2016.
I refer to your letter of the 4th of February 2016 to Fiona Murray, solicitor, The Camden Business Centre, 12 Camden Row, Dublin 8.
I note from your letter of the 4th of February 2016 to Ms Murray that you refer to the meeting of the Complaints and Client Relations Committee held on the 2nd of February 2016 and that this division (what division may I ask?) of the Complaints and Client Relations Committee would like to meet with the two other divisions (what other divisions may I ask?) of the Committee to discuss the matter further?
Perhaps you might be good enough to explain to me how many divisions of the Complaints and Client Relations Committee there are and the functions of said divisions in this matter?
I consider these divisions to be a matter of public interest and debate considering you have never brought these ‘divisions’ to my attention before or during our lengthy correspondence in relation to the solicitor Fiona Murray.
Further, I note from your letter to Ms Murray that at the present time there is no date set for this meeting between the three ‘divisions’ of the Complaints and Client Relations Committee but, however, the meeting should be within the next few months! Who are you kidding Mr Clohessy?
Now Mr Clohessy, do you and the Law Society take me for a fool. Do you seriously think for one moment that I would seriously accept the contents of your letter to the solicitor Murray?  I am saying without any doubt that you and the Law Society are involved in protecting one, possibly two registered members of the law society from criminal prosecution. I refer in particular to the matter of the deceit and deception between Ms Fiona Murray and the solicitor Mr Herbert Kilcline of which you are fully aware.
As you and the Law Society will be very well aware, deception is a criminal offence contrary to Section 6 and 7 of the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud [2001.] Offences) Act, 2001.
Making gain or causing loss by deception. Obtaining services by deception.
6.—(1) A person who dishonestly, with the intention of making a gain for himself or herself or another, or of causing loss to another, by any deception induces another to do or refrain from doing an act is guilty of an offence.
(2) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on conviction on indictment to a fine or imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years or both.
7.—(1) A person who dishonestly, with the intention of making a gain for himself or herself or another, or of causing loss to another, by any deception obtains services from another is guilty of an offence.
I have put you and the Regulation Section of the Law Society in full possession of the substantive evidence concerning the deception on the part of the solicitor Fiona Murray and the solicitor Herbert Kilcline.
I refer to the document submitted by Ms. Murray to your good self, by way of attachment together with her letter to you dated the 13th of August 2015, said attached document with manuscript notes thereon in the handwriting of the solicitor Mr. Herbert Kilcline where it is falsely claimed that I gave authority to Mr. Kilcline to authorize Ms. Murray to pay €5,000 to Cyril O’Neill Cost Accountant.
I attach for your perusal and the perusal of the various divisions you have referred to, a true copy of my letter of authority to the solicitor Herbert Kilcline dated the 27th of June 2013 wherein I make no mention of giving any authority to Mr. Kilcline to authorize Ms. Murray to pay cost accountant any monies whatsoever.
Further, without too much forensics into the considerable correspondence in this matter one has to ask as to why Ms. Murray did not submit said document of the 27th of June 2013 in evidence to The Law Society in previous correspondence prior to the 18th of August 2015 when it is clear as daylight this document was in her possession from the 3rd of September 2013 until the 13th of August 2015, a period of nearly three (3) years?
Further, I first became aware of said document and alleged authorization to pay monies to cost accountant Cyril O’Neill when said document was attached to a letter from you to me dated the 18th of August 2015.
I am clearly stating that the solicitors Murray and Kilcline conspired together to concoct an alleged authority to pay €5,000 of my monies to cost accountant Cyril O’Neill and in doing so committed the indictable criminal offence, Deception, contrary to Section 6 and 7 of the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud [2001.] Offences) Act, 2001.
Making gain or causing loss by deception. Obtaining services by deception.
6.—(1) A person who dishonestly, with the intention of making a gain for himself or herself or another, or of causing loss to another, by any deception induces another to do or refrain from doing an act is guilty of an offence.
(2) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on conviction on indictment to a fine or imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years or both.
7.—(1) A person who dishonestly, with the intention of making a gain for himself or herself or another, or of causing loss to another, by any deception obtains services from another is guilty of an offence.
I am also stating that your good self and the Regulation Section of The Law Society are well aware or should have been fully aware of the criminal actions of both registered members of the Law Society those registered members being Ms. Fiona Murray, solicitor, the Camden Business Centre, 12 Camden Row, Dublin 8, and Mr. Herbert Kilcline, solicitor, 10 Bessborough Parade, Rathmines, Dublin 6 and that you, yourself or the Law Society should have referred this matter to the proper authorities, the Gardaí for investigation with a view to prosecution and conviction of both solicitors, Murray and Kilcline, for the indictable criminal offence, deception, contrary to Section 6 and 7 of the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act, 2001.
As you will be aware my formal complaint regarding the above matter was lodged to the Law Society on the 4th of October 2011 a period of close on 5 years without any resolution in sight by the Law Society.
Whilst there is copious documentation on my formal complaint of the 4th of October 2011 to the Law Society, all documents have been retained on file and also electronically scanned to disc.
At this point in time it is a matter of principle with me as I have absolutely no difficulty I coming to the conclusion that the Law Society has no intention of closing this matter.
There is much information of public interest contained in the files relating to my involvement with the Complaints Section of the Law Society since 2002 or slightly earlier. In this respect I will re-consider my options.
I attach for your interest and the interest of the various divisions of the Law Society a true copy of document in relation to alleged authorisation submitted to the Law Society as evidence by the solicitor Fiona Murray – just in case you have lost the one sent to you and the Law Society by Ms. Murray.
I have respected privacy and confidentiality for long enough.
________________________Edward Hernon
THUG’S EVIL LEGACY 

Brave solicitor threatened by evil Kinahan cartel gangster Alan Wilson ‘will always be in fear of him’

A BRAVE solicitor ­previously threatened by convicted Kinahan cartel gang member Alan Wilson said last night: “I will always be in fear of him.”

Herbert Kilcline was speaking after the 40-year-old received a six-year prison sentence at the Special Criminal Court in Dublin on Monday over his involvement in a plot to kill Gary Hanley.

                         Thug Alan Wilson was jailed for six years this                         week

2
Thug Alan Wilson was jailed for six years this weekCredit: Padraig O’Reilly

                         Solicitor Herbert Kilcline was previously                         threatened by Alan Wilson

Solicitor Herbert Kilcline was previously threatened by Alan Wilson  Credit: Garrett White – The Sun Dublin

At his hearing at the court two weeks ago, a letter was read to the hearing from Wilson expressing regret for helping to direct the ­murder bid.

The former carer — who was part of a hit team that included his cousin Luke Wilson and pal Joseph Kelly — received the sentence ­on Monday after he pleaded guilty to conspiring to kill the Dublin man between September 15 and November 6, 2017.

Before he was recruited by the Kinahan cartel to wage war on Gerry ‘The Monk’ Hutch and anyone identified as his associates, Wilson issued threats to Mr Kilcline and others who made statements against him when he was charged with the killing of Romanian teen Marioara Rostas.

Although Wilson, who was viciously attacked in prison last month, was later cleared of the 2008 murder, the civil law specialist believes he will always be a target.

‘I DON’T WANT TO LIVE IN FEAR FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE’

Mr Kilcline said: “He played a central role in trying to kill another human being and yet he only gets six years. People get longer sentences for burglary.

He apologised to the court for his actions and I can only hope he’s now reformed for my sake because I don’t want to live in fear for the rest of my life.

Wilson was working for the most dangerous criminal gang in the country and I think if he had succeeded in his plan he would have had the money to pay people to come after me.

When he was around in the months before he was caught he didn’t come near me but I still received an official warning from the Gardai that my life was under threat.

“It’s good news for the people of Ireland that he’s off the streets but he could quite easily have received the maximum sentence of ten years because he was directing two other men to murder a man at his home.

“I doubt any other criminal gang will employ him after he gets out because he was caught but I will still have anxiety and will be looking over my shoulder. He’s just a nobody now because people in prison aren’t afraid to attack him and this would never have happened a few years ago.”

‘INTIMIDATED A LOT OF PEOPLE’

Mr Kilcline also told of his fears for those who have been threatened by Wilson.

He added: “I have sympathy for others who were once close to him but soon found themselves being bullied by him.

“Alan has intimidated a lot of people who he believes have crossed him over the years.

“There are a lot of people out there who have been threatened and they will certainly welcome the fact that he’s now behind bars.”

Although Wilson is now off the streets, gardai believe there are still young hoods working for the ­Kinahan cartel.

However investigators have also vowed to crack down on the gangs ­operating in Blanchardstown, Finglas and Coolock.

The civil lawyer spoke to us after investigators from the Garda ­National Drugs and Organised Crime Bureau foiled another gangland hit in the early hours of yesterday morning.

THUGS ON WAY TO MURDER RIVAL

During yesterday’s operation, officers arrested two men and recovered a revolver and a pistol after stopping a car in the Kilmore area of Coolock in north Dublin.

The Irish Sun can reveal the men are associates of Sean Little, who was shot dead in north Dublin on May 22.

Detectives believe the men — who have links to the drugs trade and the stolen motor vehicle trade in north Dublin — were on their way to murder a rival.

One of the suspects was also linked to a number of shooting incidents in the north in recent weeks.

Officers are also probing if the planned hit was in retaliation for Little’s killing. One theory is that the suspects were targeting a major gangster in the Coolock area who has links to Mr Flashy.

A source said: “Tensions remain high in the Coolock area and there are a lot of people under threat.

“There is a lot of paranoia out there with different people being blamed for Little’s murder.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s