Judge overturns RTB’s decision to uphold eviction against woman over son’s alleged anti-social behaviour

•

The High Court has overturned a Residential Tenancies Board (RTB) finding that a woman was lawfully given a notice to leave her residence by her landlord due to an alleged incident of anti-social behaviour by one of her children.

In his judgement Mr Justice Garrett Simons upheld an appeal, brought on a point of law, by Carine Kapihga Iyaba against RTB’s determination that her landlord’s decision to serve her with a notice terminating her tenancy on the grounds of anti-social behaviour was valid.

The notice was issued in respect of a property at Boroimhe, Swords, Co Dublin, where Ms Iyaba has lived for many years.

The judge, whose decision allows her to remain at the property, said that the RTB had erred in its finding that Ms Iyaba had “allowed” the alleged incident of anti-social behaviour to have occurred.

She had been out of the country at the time of the incident which took place at a property in the same housing estate where she resides.

While that in itself was not a reason for setting aside the RTB’s decision, the judge said that the specific fasts of this were that she was not liable for, nor could she have reasonably anticipated nor prevented the single event of anti-social behaviour “still less taken steps to prevent same.”

The judge added that the court’s conclusions were reached due to the “very specific circumstances of this case”.

He further ruled that it should not be remitted back for a rehearing by the RTB.

The RTB’ s Tenancy Tribunal which made the decision “cannot lawfully uphold the notice of termination on the facts found by it,” he added.

The judge said that the incident centred around an incident that occurred on November 21st 2021 when Ms Iyaba’s eldest son is alleged to have turned up at the property of a neighbouring family in the company of twenty other persons.

It is claimed that he broke that property’s front door, two windows and damaged the owners van, resulting in the Gardai being called.

The family living at that property claimed that they were left terrified as a result of the incident.

The incident is alleged to have been sparked off when the owner of the damaged property turned up at her property and made a complaint to two adults about a minor incident where his young son was alleged pushed by Ms Iyaba’s younger son.

Ms Iyaba was not present in Ireland at the time of the incident.

Her parents were caring for her children at the time, the judge noted.

The complainant denied claims that he used bad language or shouted at Ms Iyaba’s parents.

He also rejected claims that he had assaulted one of her sons and had aggravated matter by using a stick.

Last December the RTB, is the public body that regulates the housing rental sector, and whose functions includes the provision of a dispute resolution service for tenants and landlords, found the landlords decision to issue a notice terminating her tenancy was valid.

Represented by Paul O’Shea Bl Ms Iyaba appealed that decision to the High Court on several ground of law including that the RTB was wrong to rely on video evidence of the family member taken by a member of the complainant family, as well as a finding that the house where the anti-social behaviour allegedly occurred is in the vicinity of her residence.

It was further argued by Ms Iyaba’s lawyers that the RTB was bias against her because it was aware of allegations in relation to a subsequent unproven incident of November 26th 2021.

The RTB had opposed the action, where the Dublin Simon Community was a notice party.

In his judgement Mr Justice Simons rejected all of the applicants’ grounds except the claim that the board had erred by finding she had allowed the alleged incident of anti-social behaviour to occur.

She had not breached her obligations of the 2004 Residential Tenancies Act to allow other occupier or visitors to the dwelling to behave within it or in the vicinity in a way that is anti-social.

The RTB had erred in law when making that finding, and that the notice of termination of Ms Iyaba’s tenancy by her landlord was valid, he concluded.