Posted by IT’S A SINN: AS DETAILS EMERGE OF HORRIFIC BALLYMENA CHILD ABDUCTION & GANG RAPE, LET’S EXAMINE SINN FEIN’S HYPOCRISY ON BALLYMENA VIOLENCE The Ballymena schoolgirl who was dragged down an alleyway and into a garage by three non national males was abducted, falsely imprisoned and seemingly gang raped. Let’s call it what it is. The child said there were two mattresses in the garage. It was “alleged” that two of the males had their genitals exposed and “started touching themselves”. The child said that the two males tried to force her to perform sex acts on them (forcing a penis in someone’s mouth is rape in NI). She also said that the third male, who has since fled Ireland, raped her. After hearing a male voice outside, the suspects ran off, and she was able to escape. What else would have happened if that man hadn’t come along when he did? Sinn Fein first leader Michelle O’Neill condemned the violent riots that followed. She stated it’s “pure racism, there’s no other way to dress it up” and it was “abhorrent and must stop immediately”. She said those responsible “bring nothing to our communities but hatred, fear and division” (yes, but not rape?). Perhaps she should also be concerned with the dressing down and minimising of the crime itself? DUP Deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly added: “there are some very serious issues in terms of the disorder and violence…the absolute unacceptable nature of the thuggery”. She also added, “Violence is wrong, it is entirely unacceptable, it must stop.” However, previously, SF HAS JUSTIFIED VIOLENCE. In 2022 O’Neill told a BBC News podcast there had been NO alternative to IRA violence during the Troubles (Jean McConville would surely disagree). But isn’t it plausible that locals may feel that, similarly, they have no alternative when it comes to protecting their children? The locals have new “Troubles” and politicians are the ones who have foisted those issues onto them and left them to deal with the resultant issues. Then they call them racists. Regardless of whether anyone agrees with the riots or not, the fact remains that Ballymena residents did not feel assured that politicians or police would address the issue of unvetted migrant led sexual violence being perpetrated against children. They took matters into their own hands and will likely do so again. It is surely only a matter of time. If the establishment ignores this fact and refuses to deal with public discontent about unsustainable levels of inward migration (with no criminal checks ), then they are culpable in terms of any violence. Of O’Neill’s comments [“no alternative to violence”], Colin Worton said there had always been alternatives. His brother Kenneth Worton was one of 10 workmen murdered by the IRA in 1976. He stated “It is really hard to listen to her, I am not surprised at what she said, but it is very sickening…the choice was always there – murder or not to murder, bomb or not to bomb. We should not be rewarding people who took life, they call them people, they are more like animals.” Sinn Fein aside, SDLP (UK Labour’s sister party) leader Claire Hanna responded to the Ballymena riots by saying some politicians had not criticised the violence enough; “We are hearing words of condemnation which are, at best insincere, and many people would describe as weaselly”. If one did not know her political affiliations, they may think she was criticising the lack of sincere condemnation of migrant sexual violence against a child. As for her use of the word “weaselly” this could easily be applied to the SDLP and SF, and, for the latter ” moral hypocrisy” comes to mind but that doesn’t matter to SF. Nor it seems does it matter to them that all the name calling in the world is not going to prevent the people of Ballymena dealing with “Troubles” (child abduction & rape) their way now that a politically driven mass immigration molotov cocktail has been thrown into their lives. By Susanne Delaney
·
2,705 Views
Who Watches the Watchers? 