hears they have power to cancel penalty points

The five accused have pleaded not guilty before Limerick Circuit Criminal Court to a total of 39 offences of “engaging in conduct tending and intending to pervert the course of justice contrary to common law”

A trial of four Gardaí and a retired Garda Superintendent accused of unlawfully intervening in potential or pending fixed charge penalty notice (FCPN) prosecutions, heard Tuesday, that gardai in senior positions have the power to cancel FCPNs in certain circumstances.

The five accused have pleaded not guilty before Limerick Circuit Criminal Court to a total of 39 offences of “engaging in conduct tending and intending to pervert the course of justice contrary to common law” arising out of an investigation by members of the Garda National Bureau of Criminal Investigation (GNBCI).

The accused are retired Superintendent Edmund ‘Eamon’ O’Neill; serving Sergeants Michelle Leahy, and Anne-Marie Hassett; Garda Tom McGlinchey, and Garda Colm Geary, all stationed within Limerick and Clare Garda Divisions.

A FCPN is an allocation of a notice of an alleged offence and not proof of an offence, it was agreed by all parties in court.

Sgt McCahey agreed with James O’Mahony, senior counsel for Sgt Anne Marie Hassett that, it was “not unusual” for people to approach their local Garda and seek advice on what “to do” after receiving a FCPN.

Sgt McCahey said members of the public could also contact the FCPN cancelling authority and query it.

Senior prosecution counsel, Carol Hanahoe, in a re-examination of Sgt McCahey asked what he would do if asked to deal with a FCPN query in respect of someone that he knew personally.

Sgt McCahey told Mr Hanahoe: “I’d give it to a colleague to investigate.”

When asked by Mr Hanahoe why he would do this, Sgt McCahey replied: “A perceived conflict of interest.”

Mr Hanahoe asked Sgt McCahey: “What would you do if you had improper instructions?”

“If somebody asked me to do something untoward I wouldn’t do it. I took an oath to do my duty without fear or favour, malice or ill will,” Sgt McCahey replied.

Asked by Mr Hanahoe as to what he would do in the event of a superior officer asking him to “alter” a FCPN, Sgt McCahy replied: “I wouldn’t do it.”

The court heard members of the (GNBCI) obtained search warrants to seize mobile phones and executed these warrants at the homes of a number of individuals.

Superintendent Blaithin Moran, Garda Roads Policing Bureau, told the court that, she did, twice a week, work out of the FCPN Cancelling Authority, Thurles, where, on occasion, she had legitimately cancelled FCPNs after physically assessing appeals sent to the authority.

Supt Moran said FCPNs for offences such as speeding; non-wearing of a seatbelt; using a mobile phone while driving; driving without insurance or a licence, as examples, may be cancelled in exceptional circumstances.

Supt Moran said cancellations may be considered, for example, in the case of a medical professional responding an emergency medical situation, or, in the case of a sudden death.

However, she said, travelling to a medical appointment or travelling to a funeral would not be considered as valid reasons to cancel.

The trial centres around motorists allegedly asking gardai to intervene in potential or pending road traffic prosecutions.

Supt Moran said gardai were able to employ discretion when dealing with members of the public.

“Discretion is on a case-by-case basis. We are a community police force,” Supt Moran said.

The trial, before Judge Roderick Maguire, and a jury of eight men and four women, is expected to last up to Christmas.