BREAKING: The Swedish judge who ruled that the Eritrean migrant who raped 16-y-old Meya Åberg won’t be deported after serving a 3-year sentence because ”the rape didn’t last long enough” has spoken out about the criticism & say judges can’t take into consideration people’s anger. The decision not to deport Yazied Mohamed has sparked global outrage. The Court of Appeal Judge Lars Viktorsson now tells

@samhallsnytt about why the 19-year-old Eritrean shouldn’t be deported. “It was a short-lived incident,” he tells Samnytt. He remains unfazed

Continue reading

You’ve heard it again and again: “It’s that George Soros behind everything.” “It’s the left being funded by hidden forces.” “They’re pulling the strings, they’ve got the money, they’re controlling the narratives.” And to many, that name — George Soros — has become shorthand for a sinister puppet-master of left-wing influence and subversion. But what if I told you the mirror image, the flip-side of that narrative is happening right now — and we’re being told the opposite story? What if the person who is actually playing the role of “king-maker” on the right, who is funding campaigns, influencing policy, shaping agendas — what if she is being pointed at as part of a conspiracy of “outsiders” while the finger continues to be pointed at Soros-type figures? That person is Miriam Adelson. An Israeli-American physician-turned-billionaire donor. She inherited and stepped into the political arena after her husband Sheldon passed away in 2021. Her net worth is estimated in the tens of billions of dollars. She and her late husband have been among the biggest donors to Trump campaigns and Republican causes for years. In 2024, the disclosure shows she donated around $100 million to a super-PAC supporting Trump. So here’s the thing: the narrative of “hidden money influencing politics” — yes, it exists. Yes, it is real. But the familiar version of who is doing it, in which direction, is incomplete. The one shouting about Soros’s influence may be pointing outward — but what about the mega-donor on their own side who is quietly shaping policy, agenda, alliances? Let me walk you through some key points I want you to bear in mind: 1. Monumental giving and access Miriam Adelson’s donations aren’t a rounding-error. They’re huge. They gate-keep access. One article notes that Trump himself at the Knesset said she had “$60 billion in her account” and remarked about how many times she and her husband visited the White House. When you donate that kind of money, you’re not just a donor — you become a lever. 2. Linking donations to agenda It’s not just about giving money. It’s about what you get in return. The Adelsons have very clear priorities: pro-Israel policy, recognition of Israeli sovereignty, annexation of the West Bank, opposition to Palestinian statehood. When you see large donations flowing in the context of campaigns where those issues get pushed, pause. That’s not coincidence. 3. Influence beyond the campaign It’s not just about election dollars. It’s about infrastructure. For example, the involvement of Miriam Adelson in the organization Maccabee Task Force — which opposes BDS (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) movements on college campuses, and promotes pro-Israel orthodox viewpoints — shows a structural influence in how political ideas are shaped and controlled. 4. Deflection, projection, and narrative control Here’s where your central point comes in: the constant narrative that “the left is being funded by outside dark money” or “George Soros is the puppet‐master” is powerful. But what if the dominant “ puppet-master” on the right is being ignored, or pointed at but not talked about in the same way? What if the accusation of “they’re the ones pulling the strings” is being projected onto “our enemies,” while “our side” is quietly doing much the same, if not more? Every time you hear a finger pointed at a certain donor or organization, ask: who else is hiding behind the curtain? 5. Why stay vigilant Because money changes politics. Access changes priorities. If a single individual or family can become deeply intertwined with a major presidential candidate, shaping foreign-policy decisions, campaign strategy, key appointments — then what we call “democracy” starts to bend. If people believe campaigns are funded by “the left” but ignore the mega-donor on the right, they’ll never see the full picture. And without seeing it, you cannot act to correct for it.